↓ Skip to main content

Transcatheter arterial embolization followed by laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy for spontaneous rupture of a giant hepatic angiomyolipoma: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcatheter arterial embolization followed by laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy for spontaneous rupture of a giant hepatic angiomyolipoma: a case report
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1329535
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianjun Wang, Ruizi Shi, Hua Luo, Pei Yang, Huiwen Luo, Ziqing Gao, Decai Wang, Xintao Zeng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#21,309,356
of 26,168,182 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,183
of 4,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,908
of 374,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#20
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,168,182 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,017 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.