↓ Skip to main content

A retrospective case series of the treatment of spontaneous quadriceps tendon rupture in patients with uremia and secondary hyperparathyroidism

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A retrospective case series of the treatment of spontaneous quadriceps tendon rupture in patients with uremia and secondary hyperparathyroidism
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, February 2023
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2023.961188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuang Wu, Huihui Wang, Yanlin Zhu, Weili Fu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2023.
All research outputs
#20,884,375
of 23,505,669 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,472
of 3,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,980
of 389,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#77
of 332 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,669 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,269 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 332 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.