The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1303119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander O’Connor, Elizabeth Reynolds, Clare Molyneux, Dipesh H. Vasant, Abhiram Sharma, Gemma Faulkner, John McLaughlin, Edward Kiff, Karen Telford |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#21,499,559
of 26,390,482 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,189
of 4,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,016
of 379,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#25
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,390,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,043 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.