↓ Skip to main content

Early results of high tibial osteotomy versus combined arthroscopic surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early results of high tibial osteotomy versus combined arthroscopic surgery
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1325483
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenbin Zhang, Zhaolong Yan, Gongteng Wang, Wenqi Zhang, Guangxing Li, Xufeng Wang, Huaqiang Sun, Shufeng Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#21,444,336
of 26,316,370 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,185
of 4,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,042
of 375,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#23
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.