↓ Skip to main content

Minimally invasive transvaginal single-port laparoscopic vesicovaginal fistula repair: a case report and the point of this technique

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Minimally invasive transvaginal single-port laparoscopic vesicovaginal fistula repair: a case report and the point of this technique
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1331476
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianbiao Huang, Yu Cheng, Bin Wang, Haichao Chao, Xiangda Xu, Tao Zeng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#21,476,175
of 26,352,576 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,185
of 4,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,713
of 377,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#23
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,352,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,028 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.