↓ Skip to main content

Effects of different drugs in combination with PKP/PVP on postoperative pain in patients with osteoporotic compression fractures: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of different drugs in combination with PKP/PVP on postoperative pain in patients with osteoporotic compression fractures: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1349351
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yiguang Bai, Qiaoling Chen, RouMei Wang, Rui Huang

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,509,553
of 26,388,114 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,188
of 4,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,621
of 135,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,036 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.