↓ Skip to main content

Prioritizing patients for hip fracture surgery: the role of frailty and cardiac risk

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prioritizing patients for hip fracture surgery: the role of frailty and cardiac risk
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1367457
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maximilian Peter Forssten, Ahmad Mohammad Ismail, Ioannis Ioannidis, Marcelo A. F. Ribeiro, Yang Cao, Babak Sarani, Shahin Mohseni

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#17,110,508
of 26,122,087 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#642
of 4,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,703
of 348,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#13
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,122,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.