The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Initial experience of ureteric visualization using methylene blue during laparoscopy for gynecological surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1387038 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruyu Shao, Faquan Shen, Hooman Soleymani majd, Xiaoqing Qin, Desheng Yao, Ying Long, He Wang, Yousheng Wei, Xin Chang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2024.
All research outputs
#15,273,065
of 26,372,008 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#421
of 4,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,844
of 147,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,372,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,032 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.