The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Novel reconstruction method using long and narrow gastric tube in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for cancer: a retrospective case series study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1413939 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yoshitake Ueda, Takahide Kawasaki, Sanshi Tanabe, Kosuke Suzuki, Shigeo Ninomiya, Tsuyoshi Etoh, Masafumi Inomata, Norio Shiraishi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2024.
All research outputs
#18,036,825
of 26,395,942 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#854
of 4,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,964
of 153,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,395,942 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,043 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.