The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence of type 2 inflammation in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Saudi Arabia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1421140 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmad Aldajani, Ahmad Alroqi, Rana Alramyan, Nujud Alhejin, Mohammed Alswayyed, Waleed A. Alrajban, Saud Alromaih, Mohammad O. Aloulah, Abdulaziz S. Alrasheed, Surayie Aldousary, Saad Alsaleh |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2024.
All research outputs
#15,087,871
of 26,312,176 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#402
of 4,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,303
of 155,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,312,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them