↓ Skip to main content

The use of intraoperative CT-neuronavigation in Wiltse approach. A technical note

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, September 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The use of intraoperative CT-neuronavigation in Wiltse approach. A technical note
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, September 2024
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1433273
Authors

Marco Battistelli, Federico Valeri, Manuela D’Ercole, Alessandro Izzo, Alessandro Rapisarda, Filippo Maria Polli, Nicola Montano

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2024.
All research outputs
#21,637,100
of 26,560,265 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,219
of 4,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,973
of 129,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#13
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,560,265 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,088 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.