The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advancing endovascular neurosurgery training with extended reality: opportunities and obstacles for the next decade
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1440228 |
| Authors |
Shray A. Patel, Michael M. Covell, Saarang Patel, Sandeep Kandregula, Sai Krishna Palepu, Avi A. Gajjar, Oleg Shekhtman, Georgios S. Sioutas, Ali Dhanaliwala, Terence Gade, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Visish M. Srinivasan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2024.
All research outputs
#16,854,934
of 26,536,755 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#576
of 4,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,215
of 128,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#5
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,536,755 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,081 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.