The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prediction of pyramidal tract side effect threshold by intra-operative electromyography in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for patients with Parkinson's disease under general anaesthesia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, October 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1465840 |
Authors |
Lok Wa Laura Leung, Ka Yee Claire Lau, Kwok Yee Patricia Kan, Yikjin Amelia Ng, Man Chung Matthew Chan, Chi Ping Stephanie Ng, Lok Cheung, Ka Ho Victor Hui, Yuen Chung David Chan, Xian Lun Zhu, Tat Ming Danny Chan, Wai Sang Poon |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2024.
All research outputs
#21,806,368
of 26,774,533 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,237
of 4,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,472
of 139,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#8
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,774,533 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,140 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.