↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery: cost-effectiveness, prognostic factors, and outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, September 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery: cost-effectiveness, prognostic factors, and outcomes
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, September 2024
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1482274
Authors

Mohamed Rahouma, Massimo Baudo, Akshay Kumar, Magdy El-Sayed Ahmed

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2024.
All research outputs
#21,635,983
of 26,563,001 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,219
of 4,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,564
of 129,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#13
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,091 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.