The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coupling quantitative systems pharmacology modelling to machine learning and artificial intelligence for drug development: its pAIns and gAIns
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Biology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsysb.2024.1380685 |
| Authors |
Núria Folguera-Blasco, Florencia A. T. Boshier, Aydar Uatay, Cesar Pichardo-Almarza, Massimo Lai, Jacopo Biasetti, Richard Dearden, Megan Gibbs, Holly Kimko |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2024.
All research outputs
#15,226,543
of 26,435,181 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Biology
#35
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,383
of 228,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Biology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,435,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.