The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The rise of scientific machine learning: a perspective on combining mechanistic modelling with machine learning for systems biology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Biology, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsysb.2024.1407994 |
| Authors |
Ben Noordijk, Monica L. Garcia Gomez, Kirsten H. W. J. ten Tusscher, Dick de Ridder, Aalt D. J. van Dijk, Robert W. Smith |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2024.
All research outputs
#8,603,894
of 26,429,244 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Biology
#24
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,819
of 147,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Biology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,429,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.