The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Combination of Autophagy Selective Therapeutics With Doxil: An Assessment of Pathological Toxicity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Toxicology, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/ftox.2022.937150 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kristi L. Helke, Radhika R. Gudi, Chenthamarakshan Vasu, Joe R. Delaney |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 11% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Paraguay | 1 | 11% |
Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,384,317
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Toxicology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,138
of 445,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Toxicology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them