↓ Skip to main content

The Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Toxicology, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents
Published in
Frontiers in Toxicology, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/ftox.2024.1376587
Authors

Cunningham, Amy, Kirk, Martin, Hong, Emily, Yang, Jing, Howard, Tamara, Brearley, Adrian, Sáenz-Trevizo, Angelica, Krawchuck, Jacob, Watt, John, Henderson, Ian, Dokladny, Karol, DeAguero, Joshua, Escobar, G P., Wagner, Brent

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2024.
All research outputs
#6,763,016
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Toxicology
#58
of 361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,682
of 155,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Toxicology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.