↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing Fluorescein Isothiocyanate Dextran Measurement As a Biomarker in a 24-h Feed Restriction Model to Induce Gut Permeability in Broiler Chickens

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimizing Fluorescein Isothiocyanate Dextran Measurement As a Biomarker in a 24-h Feed Restriction Model to Induce Gut Permeability in Broiler Chickens
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2017.00056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mikayla F. A. Baxter, Ruben Merino-Guzman, Juan D. Latorre, Brittany D. Mahaffey, Yichao Yang, Kyle D. Teague, Lucas E. Graham, Amanda D. Wolfenden, Xochitl Hernandez-Velasco, Lisa R. Bielke, Billy M. Hargis, Guillermo Tellez

Abstract

Fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran (FITC-d) is a 3-5 kDa marker used to measure tight junction permeability. We have previously shown that intestinal barrier function can be adversely affected by stress, poorly digested diets, or feed restriction (FR), resulting in increased intestinal inflammation-associated permeability. However, further optimization adjustments of the current FITC-d methodology are possible to enhance precision and efficacy of results in future. The objective of the present study was to optimize our current model to obtain a larger difference between control and treated groups, by optimizing the FITC-d measurement as a biomarker in a 24-h FR model to induce gut permeability in broiler chickens. One in vitro and four in vivo independent experiments were conducted. The results of the present study suggest that by increasing the dose of FITC-d (8.32 versus 4.16 mg/kg); shortening the collection time of blood samples (1 versus 2.5 h); using a pool of non-FITC-d serum as a blank, compared to previously used PBS; adding a standard curve to set a limit of detection and modifying the software's optimal sensitivity value, it was possible to obtain more consistent and reliable results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 32 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 35 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#18,542,806
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#4,152
of 6,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,716
of 310,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#45
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.