↓ Skip to main content

A Metabolomic Overview of Follicular Fluid in Cows

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Metabolomic Overview of Follicular Fluid in Cows
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2018.00010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatiane Melina Guerreiro, Roseli Fernandes Gonçalves, Carlos Fernando O. Rodrigues Melo, Diogo Noin de Oliveira, Estela de Oliveira Lima, Jose Antônio Visintin, Marcos Antônio de Achilles, Rodrigo Ramos Catharino

Abstract

Follicular fluid (FF) protects the oocyte against proteolysis and extrusion during ovulation, providing an appropriate microenvironment that favors proper embryonic development; thereby, FF plays a key role in embryo quality. Being directly related to cattle breeding, studying FF is extremely important in livestock science to measure cattle fertility. This may eventually help to assess the quality of both meat and milk, products widely consumed worldwide. There is an important commercial interest in the evaluation and characterization of compounds present in the FF of livestock that present greater likelihood of pregnancy. Mass spectrometry is a great ally for this type of analysis and can provide quick and efficient screening for molecular markers in biological samples. The present study demonstrated the potential of high-resolution mass spectrometry in analyzing FF samples from two distinct groups of Nellore cows (Bos indicus): high and low fertility, as determined by the number of oocytes produced. We were able to delineate markers of interest for each group, which may ultimately be related to biochemical pathways that lead to higher or lower reproductive performance.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 19 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 24%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 21 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2018.
All research outputs
#18,585,544
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#4,174
of 6,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,481
of 439,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#57
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.