↓ Skip to main content

Induction of Synovitis Using Interleukin-1 Beta: Are There Differences in the Response of Middle Carpal Joint Compared to the Tibiotarsal Joint?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Induction of Synovitis Using Interleukin-1 Beta: Are There Differences in the Response of Middle Carpal Joint Compared to the Tibiotarsal Joint?
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2018.00208
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aimee C. Colbath, Steven W. Dow, Leone S. Hopkins, Jennifer N. Phillips, C. Wayne McIlwraith, Laurie R. Goodrich

Abstract

Background: The effects of recombinant interleukin-1β (rIL-1β) have been described for the middle carpal joint (MCJ). However, we are unaware of any studies that have described the cytological response of the tibiotarsal joint (TTJ) to rIL-1β or compared the clinical and cytological responses of the MCJ to the TTJ following the administration of intra-articular rIL-1β. Such information is critical for researchers planning to use rIL-1β to create acute synovitis models in horses. Objectives: To compare the clinical and cytological responses of the MCJ to the TTJ following administration of intra-articular rIL-1β. Methods: Twelve horses were used for the study. Eight horses received 75 ng of rIL-1β into the MCJ and four horses received 75 ng of rIL-1β into the TTJ. Clinical and cytological outcome parameters including lameness, joint circumference, joint effusion score, total nucleated cell count, cellular differentials, C-reactive protein, and prostaglandin-E2 concentrations were determined at baseline and multiple post-treatment time points over a 336 h period (2 weeks). Results: Recombinant IL-1β administered into the TTJ resulted in a significantly greater respiratory rate at 24 h and heart rate at 12 h when compared to rIL-1β administered into the MCJ. In addition, the TTJ had a significantly greater increase in joint circumference at 24 post-injection hour (PIH) and subjective effusion grade at 24 PIH and 336 PIH. The MCJ had significantly higher total protein concentration at 6 PIH, and a significantly higher NCC at 24 and 72 PIH when compared to the TTJ. Conversely, the TTJ had significantly higher neutrophilic infiltration than the MCJ at 6 PIH and 168 PIH. Conclusions: This study establishes that the same intra-articular dose of rIL-1 β elicits significantly different clinical and cytological responses in the MCJ compared to the TTJ in the equine model of intra-articular synovitis. In addition, clinical and cytological evidence of synovitis may persist up to or >1 week following intra-articular administration of rIL-1 β.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 6 23%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2020.
All research outputs
#17,989,170
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#3,545
of 6,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,601
of 335,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#77
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.