↓ Skip to main content

A Comparative Review of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Comparative Review of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Sepsis
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, November 2018
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2018.00291
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald H. L. Li, Fern Tablin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 12%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 63 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 7%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 67 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,499,575
of 24,178,331 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,352
of 7,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,588
of 445,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#39
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,178,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.