You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chicken or the Egg: The Reciprocal Association Between Feeding Behavior and Animal Welfare and Their Impact on Productivity in Dairy Cows
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2018.00305 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pol Llonch, Eva Mainau, Ignacio R. Ipharraguerre, Fernando Bargo, Gemma Tedó, Marta Blanch, Xavier Manteca |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 20% |
| Sweden | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 41 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 28% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 19 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2018.
All research outputs
#13,115,587
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,644
of 6,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,460
of 437,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#45
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,399 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.