The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Road to TNR: Examining Trap-Neuter-Return Through the Lens of Our Evolving Ethics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2018.00341 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Joseph Wolf, Joan E. Schaffner |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 45% |
| Hungary | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 97% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 13 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,331,592
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#276
of 8,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,592
of 448,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#11
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.