↓ Skip to main content

Intestinal Bacteria as Powerful Trapping Lifeforms for the Elimination of Radioactive Cesium

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intestinal Bacteria as Powerful Trapping Lifeforms for the Elimination of Radioactive Cesium
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, March 2019
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2019.00070
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuki Saito, Kengo Kuroda, Rie Suzuki, Yasushi Kino, Tsutomu Sekine, Hisashi Shinoda, Hideaki Yamashiro, Tomokazu Fukuda, Jin Kobayashi, Yasuyuki Abe, Junko Nishimura, Yusuke Urushihara, Hiroshi Yoneyama, Manabu Fukumoto, Emiko Isogai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Lecturer 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 42%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#18,909,315
of 24,093,053 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#3,947
of 7,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,031
of 355,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#96
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,093,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.