↓ Skip to main content

Anatomical Pathology, Behavioral, and Physiological Responses Induced by Application of Non-penetrating Captive Bolt Devices in Layer Chickens

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anatomical Pathology, Behavioral, and Physiological Responses Induced by Application of Non-penetrating Captive Bolt Devices in Layer Chickens
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, March 2019
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2019.00089
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rathnayaka Mudiyanselage Amila Subhashinie Bandara, Stephanie Torrey, Patricia V. Turner, Karen Schwean-Lardner, Tina M. Widowski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 12 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,011,762
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,214
of 6,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,635
of 351,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#41
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.