The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
One Health Surveillance: A Matrix to Evaluate Multisectoral Collaboration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2019.00109 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marion Bordier, Camille Delavenne, Dung Thuy Thi Nguyen, Flavie Luce Goutard, Pascal Hendrikx |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 2 | 25% |
| South Africa | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 15 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 24% |
| Unknown | 31 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,519,623
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,085
of 7,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,622
of 355,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#29
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.