↓ Skip to main content

Ethnoveterinary Therapeutic Practices and Conservation Status of the Medicinal Flora of Chamla Valley, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethnoveterinary Therapeutic Practices and Conservation Status of the Medicinal Flora of Chamla Valley, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, May 2019
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2019.00122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khalid Khan, Inayat Ur Rahman, Eduardo Soares Calixto, Niaz Ali, Farhana Ijaz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 42 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 22%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 45 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,862,232
of 26,577,771 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2,531
of 8,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,643
of 369,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#54
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,577,771 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.