The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ethnoveterinary Therapeutic Practices and Conservation Status of the Medicinal Flora of Chamla Valley, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2019.00122 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Khalid Khan, Inayat Ur Rahman, Eduardo Soares Calixto, Niaz Ali, Farhana Ijaz |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
Researcher | 10 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 15% |
Unknown | 42 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 22% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 14% |
Unknown | 45 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,862,232
of 26,577,771 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2,531
of 8,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,643
of 369,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#54
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,577,771 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.