You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Marmots and Yersinia pestis Strains in Two Plague Endemic Areas of Tien Shan Mountains
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2019.00207 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gulmira Sariyeva, Gulnara Bazarkanova, Ravshambek Maimulov, Sabirzhan Abdikarimov, Berzhan Kurmanov, Aigul Abdirassilova, Anton Shabunin, Zaurbek Sagiyev, Aigul Dzhaparova, Ziyat Abdel, Raikhan Mussagaliyeva, Serge Morand, Vladimir Motin, Michael Kosoy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 40% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Librarian | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 20% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 20% |
Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,704,827
of 24,703,227 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#498
of 7,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,336
of 353,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#17
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,703,227 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.