↓ Skip to main content

Mycobacterium microti: Not Just a Coincidental Pathogen for Cats

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mycobacterium microti: Not Just a Coincidental Pathogen for Cats
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2020.590037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Peterhans, Patricia Landolt, Ute Friedel, Francisca Oberhänsli, Matthias Dennler, Barbara Willi, Mirjam Senn, Sandro Hinden, Karin Kull, Anja Kipar, Roger Stephan, Giovanni Ghielmetti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Professor 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 12 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2021.
All research outputs
#13,205,432
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,666
of 6,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,361
of 509,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#111
of 416 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 416 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.