↓ Skip to main content

Review of Diagnostic Tests for Detection of Mycobacterium bovis Infection in South African Wildlife

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review of Diagnostic Tests for Detection of Mycobacterium bovis Infection in South African Wildlife
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, January 2021
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2021.588697
Pubmed ID
Authors

Netanya Bernitz, Tanya J. Kerr, Wynand J. Goosen, Josephine Chileshe, Roxanne L. Higgitt, Eduard O. Roos, Christina Meiring, Rachiel Gumbo, Candice de Waal, Charlene Clarke, Katrin Smith, Samantha Goldswain, Taschnica T. Sylvester, Léanie Kleynhans, Anzaan Dippenaar, Peter E. Buss, David V. Cooper, Konstantin P. Lyashchenko, Robin M. Warren, Paul D. van Helden, Sven D. C. Parsons, Michele A. Miller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Unspecified 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 43 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 15%
Unspecified 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 45 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,394,626
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,345
of 6,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,795
of 505,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#83
of 376 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 376 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.