↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Proteomic Analyses Between Biofilm-Forming and Non-biofilm-Forming Strains of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis Isolated From Goats

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative Proteomic Analyses Between Biofilm-Forming and Non-biofilm-Forming Strains of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis Isolated From Goats
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, February 2021
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2021.614011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Conceição Aquino de Sá, Wanderson Marques da Silva, Carla Catarine Santos Rodrigues, Cristiana Perdigão Rezende, Silvana Beutinger Marchioro, José Tadeu Raynal Rocha Filho, Thiago de Jesus Sousa, Helinando Pequeno de Oliveira, Mateus Matiuzzi da Costa, Henrique César Pereira Figueiredo, Ricardo Dias Portela, Thiago Luiz de Paula Castro, Vasco Azevedo, Nubia Seyffert, Roberto Meyer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 11 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 15 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2021.
All research outputs
#18,124,408
of 23,281,392 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#3,607
of 6,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,714
of 421,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#222
of 380 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,281,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.