The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Isolation, Identification, and Evaluation of the Pathogenicity of a Porcine Enterovirus G Isolated From China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2021.712679 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xue Mi, Chunjie Yang, Ying Lu, Hejie Wang, Qiuying Qin, Ronglin Chen, Zhenkong Chen, Yunyan Luo, Ying Chen, Zuzhang Wei, Weijian Huang, Kang Ouyang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#16,651,746
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#3,071
of 8,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,121
of 449,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#156
of 450 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 450 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.