The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Parainfluenza and corona viruses in a fallow deer (Dama dama) with fatal respiratory disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2022.1059681 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akbar Dastjerdi, Tobias Floyd, Vanessa Swinson, Hannah Davies, Andrew Barber, Alan Wight |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2024.
All research outputs
#3,397,792
of 26,080,956 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#663
of 8,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,115
of 491,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#17
of 499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,080,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 491,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.