The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethical Analysis of the Application of Assisted Reproduction Technologies in Biodiversity Conservation and the Case of White Rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) Ovum Pick-Up Procedures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2022.831675 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierfrancesco Biasetti, Thomas B. Hildebrandt, Frank Göritz, Robert Hermes, Susanne Holtze, Cesare Galli, Giovanna Lazzari, Silvia Colleoni, Ilaria Pollastri, Maria Michela Spiriti, Jan Stejskal, Steven Seet, Jan Zwilling, Stephen Ngulu, Samuel Mutisya, Linus Kariuki, Isaac Lokolool, Patrick Omondo, David Ndeereh, Barbara de Mori |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 17% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,384,447
of 26,329,145 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,353
of 8,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,223
of 451,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#65
of 536 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,329,145 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 536 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.