↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Two Different Canine Anti-IgG Antibodies for Assessment of Oligoclonal Bands in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Serum of Dogs via Isoelectric Focusing Followed by an Immunoblot

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Two Different Canine Anti-IgG Antibodies for Assessment of Oligoclonal Bands in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Serum of Dogs via Isoelectric Focusing Followed by an Immunoblot
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2022
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2022.873456
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia K. Prümmer, Veronika M. Stein, Eliane Marti, Mario Ziegler, Andreas Lutterotti, Ilijas Jelcic, Frank Steffen, Thorsten Buch, Arianna Maiolini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 24%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 59%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#18,487,595
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#4,149
of 6,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,284
of 434,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#356
of 615 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 615 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.