The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Suitability of Dried Blood Spots for Accelerating Veterinary Biobank Collections and Identifying Metabolomics Biomarkers With Minimal Resources
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2022.887163 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Allaway, Janet E. Alexander, Laura J. Carvell-Miller, Rhiannon M. Reynolds, Catherine L. Winder, Ralf J. M. Weber, Gavin R. Lloyd, Andrew D. Southam, Warwick B. Dunn |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 2 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 17% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#16,192,854
of 24,631,014 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#3,151
of 7,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,277
of 432,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#225
of 610 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,631,014 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 610 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.