The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Stocking density, restricted trough space, and implications for sheep behaviour and biological functioning
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2022.965635 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bonnie T. Mayes, L. Amy Tait, Frances C. Cowley, John M. Morton, Brendan P. Doyle, Muhammad A. Arslan, Peta S. Taylor |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#18,913,395
of 23,435,471 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#4,325
of 6,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,674
of 439,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#302
of 540 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,435,471 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 540 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.