The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Maxillary neoplasms in four dromedary camels
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2023.1153398 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abdelazim Ibrahim, Mohamed Zabady, Ayman El Nahas, Ahmed Aljazzar, Fahad Al-Hizab, Mahmoud Kandeel, Brian F. Porter |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#17,319,356
of 26,202,139 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#3,618
of 8,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,205
of 382,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#181
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,202,139 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.