The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Detection of intercontinental reassortant H6 avian influenza viruses from wild birds in South Korea, 2015 and 2017
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2023.1157984 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ji-Yun Kim, Sun-Hak Lee, Da-Won Kim, Dong-Wook Lee, Chang-Seon Song, Dong-Hun Lee, Jung-Hoon Kwon |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,682,600
of 26,436,676 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,471
of 8,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,665
of 393,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#34
of 397 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,436,676 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 397 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.