You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of sources and levels of dietary supplementary manganese on growing yak’s in vitro rumen fermentation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2023.1175894 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Huizhen Lu, Pengpeng Liu, Shujie Liu, Xinsheng Zhao, Binqiang Bai, Jianbo Cheng, Zijun Zhang, Cai Sun, Lizhuang Hao, Yanfeng Xue |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2023.
All research outputs
#16,551,361
of 26,106,015 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2,968
of 8,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,331
of 392,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#119
of 400 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 400 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.