The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rapid construction of infectious clones for distinct Newcastle disease virus genotypes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, May 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2023.1178801 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zuhua Yu, Yuhao Zhang, Zedian Li, Qingzhong Yu, Yanyan Jia, Chuan Yu, Jian Chen, Songbiao Chen, Lei He |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
#16,560,158
of 26,122,087 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2,973
of 8,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,538
of 397,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#129
of 404 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,122,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 404 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.