↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Evaluations of the disease surveillance centre network in Scotland: what parts has it reached?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Evaluations of the disease surveillance centre network in Scotland: what parts has it reached?
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, April 2023
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2023.1192445
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew J. Duncan, Jude I. Eze, Franz Brülisauer, Julie M. Stirling, Amy Jennings, Sue C. Tongue

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2023.
All research outputs
#19,092,409
of 23,659,844 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#4,428
of 6,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,565
of 293,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#148
of 326 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,659,844 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 326 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.