The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of chlorhexidine salts as potential alternatives to potassium dichromate for Eimeria maxima M6 oocyst preservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2023.1226298 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren Laverty, Lesleigh C. Beer, Kristen Martin, Xochitl Hernandez-Velasco, Marco A. Juarez-Estrada, Marcela Arango-Cardona, Aaron J. Forga, Makenly E. Coles, Christine N. Vuong, Juan D. Latorre, Roberto Señas-Cuesta, Ileana Loeza, Latasha S. Gray, John R. Barta, Billy M. Hargis, Guillermo Tellez-Isaias, Brittany D. Graham |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#21,427,254
of 26,296,035 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#5,558
of 8,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,439
of 373,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#265
of 364 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,296,035 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 364 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.