The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic evaluation for production and body size traits using different animal models in purebred-Duroc pigs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2023.1274266 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fuchen Zhou, Danyang Lin, Linsong Dong, Yifeng Hong, Haiyu Zeng, Gengyuan Cai, Jian Ye, Zhenfang Wu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2023.
All research outputs
#16,580,195
of 26,150,897 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2,996
of 8,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,570
of 374,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#90
of 393 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,897 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 393 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.