The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis of the antioxidant activity of toons sinensis extract and their biological effects on broilers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2023.1337291 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiangmin Zhao, Baolong Du, Minyan Wan, Jinlu Li, Shizhen Qin, Fang Nian, Defu Tang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#21,400,044
of 26,262,977 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#5,566
of 8,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,011
of 375,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#233
of 399 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,262,977 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 399 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.