The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Background and common lesions in the female reproductive organs of giant anteaters (Myrmecophaga tridactyla)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2024.1287872 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fernanda Barthelson Carvalho de Moura, Zara Alves Lacerda, José Luiz Catão-Dias, Pedro Enrique Navas-Suárez, Karin Werther, Sarah Raquel Jesus Santos Simões, Renato de Lima Santos, Daniel Felipe Barrantes Murillo, Tatiane Terumi Negrão Watanabe, Carlos Eduardo Fonseca-Alves, Noeme Sousa Rocha |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#16,768,102
of 26,383,000 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#3,138
of 8,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,516
of 379,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#103
of 382 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,383,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 382 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.