You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Construction and characterization of a reverse genetics system of bovine parainfluenza virus type 3c as a tool for rapid screening of antivirals in vitro
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2024.1336663 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yu Han, Kejia Lu, Riteng Zhang, Xi Wei, Hanwei Guo, Lina Tong, Xinglong Wang, Sa Xiao, Haijin Liu, Zengqi Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#16,555,988
of 26,114,666 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2,971
of 8,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,559
of 347,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#55
of 304 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,114,666 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 304 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.