The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2024.1370909 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raman Ghimire, Janine L. Brown, Chatchote Thitaram, Pakkanut Bansiddhi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#16,246,313
of 26,122,087 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2,676
of 8,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,959
of 347,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#42
of 304 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,122,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 304 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.