The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A study on the treatment effects of Crataegus pinnatifida polysaccharide on non-alcoholic fatty liver in mice by modulating gut microbiota
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2024.1383801 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ping Hao, Xiaonan Yang, Wen Yin, Xinyi Wang, Yun Ling, Mengyao Zhu, Yue Yu, Shouhai Chen, Yuan Yuan, Xiaoyu Quan, Zhiheng Xu, Jiahui Zhang, Wenjia Zhao, Ying Zhang, Chunlian Song, Qing Xu, Shuangshuang Qin, Yi Wu, Xianghua Shu, Kunhua Wei |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#21,337,274
of 26,189,645 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#5,527
of 8,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,986
of 345,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#155
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,189,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.